🔵 BETA Version · 測試版 平台尚未正式運作,功能仍在測試調整中
dozenup
十二online第12人

球例知識庫

判罰為什麼這樣吹?越位、手球、VAR、DOGSO、有利、補時、烏龍球,這些最常吵的球例,先把規則講清楚。 每張卡都標了怎麼判、哪裡最容易搞錯,要看原文的可以展開對照。

規則以 IFAB《足球競賽規則》為準;本頁每張卡都🟢 附 IFAB 規則原文與來源、逐字核實(展開「規則原文」即見英文出處)。這裡只講規則、不評對錯。

越位

3

越位怎樣才算「參與」

🟢IFAB 一手核實

站在越位位置本身不犯規;要「參與」才判:接到隊友傳/觸的球、或干擾到對手,才算越位犯規。

怎麼判

看隊友最後觸球那一刻進攻球員的位置;那刻越位 + 之後有參與 = 犯規。

常見誤解

「他站越位位就該吹」→ 錯,要有參與才判。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 11:越位位置本身不犯規

    It is not an offence to be in an offside position.

  • IFAB Law 11:干擾比賽 interfering with play

    interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate

  • IFAB Law 11:干擾對手 interfering with an opponent(四款,逐項;犯其一即成立)

    preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision · challenging an opponent for the ball · clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent · making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

  • IFAB Law 11:獲得利益 gaining an advantage

    gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent; been deliberately saved by any opponent

判例:葡 2-1 克,Pašalić 在隊友 Matanović 觸球那刻越位。IFAB Law 11 verbatim 經 theifab.com + thefa.com 雙源核實。

越位「重置」三分法:解圍/折射/救球 ⭐

🟢IFAB 一手核實

球到越位球員之前碰到防守方,會不會「重置」越位、讓進球有效?看那下觸球是三種裡哪一種:有意識解圍(重置,進球有效)/被動折射(不重置)/故意救球(即使故意也不重置)。

怎麼判

只有「有意識解圍 deliberate play」重置越位。指標:看得到球、球不快、方向不意外、有時間協調動作 → deliberate;短距/看不清/球快/來不及/純本能伸腳 → deflection。解圍失敗、踢歪不影響它是 deliberate。

常見誤解

誤解一:「救球 = 擋任何有威脅的傳中」→ 錯,救球測的是球的去向(是否正射向球門),不是情勢危不危險;傳中橫過門前不算射門。誤解二:「碰到就重置」→ 錯,折射與救球都不重置。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 11:offside offence

    A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately played the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent.

  • IFAB Law 11:deliberate play 判準

    'Deliberate play' is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of passing the ball to a team-mate, gaining possession of the ball, or clearing the ball.

  • IFAB Law 11:save 定義

    A 'save' is when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal with any part of the body except the hands/arms (unless the goalkeeper within the penalty area).

判例:葡 2-1 克,後衛被判非故意折射(不重置)。判罰爭議最常吵、最容易搞錯的一條。

越位「干擾對手」細分:擋視線/爭球/明顯影響

🟢IFAB 一手核實

越位球員光是站在越位位置不會被吹,只有「干擾對手」才算犯規。「干擾對手」分四種情況:清楚擋住對手的視線、和對手爭搶球權、球很接近時做出動作並影響對手、或做出任何明顯影響對手觸球能力的動作,符合其中一種即成立。但如果只是身體站位擋住對手的前進路線,卻沒有影響對手觸球的能力,不算越位,改依一般犯規(Law 12)處理。

怎麼判

四款逐一列出,符合其中一款即成立犯規:①清楚擋住對手(常見於門將)看球的視線,令對手無法觸球或判斷來球;②主動和對手爭搶球權;③球很接近時做出明顯動作,並因此影響到對手;④做出任何明顯動作,清楚影響對手觸球的能力。關鍵區分:若越位球員只是移動到對手前面、擋住對手的前進路線,但沒有影響對手觸球的能力,屬於一般阻擋,改依 Law 12 判罰,不算越位。

常見誤解

「人擋在門將和球中間就一定吹越位」→ 錯,要清楚擋住對手的視線並影響其觸球能力,才算越位犯規;若只是身體位置擋路但沒有實際影響對手觸球,可能改判一般犯規(Law 12),甚至完全不吹。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 11:干擾對手四款

    preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision · challenging an opponent for the ball · clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent · making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

  • IFAB Law 11:干擾對手與一般阻擋(Law 12)的區分

    a player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball, this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball; if the player moves into the way of an opponent and impedes the opponent's progress (e.g. blocks the opponent), the offence should be penalised under Law 12

本卡是卡 O1「參與」判準中「干擾對手」四款的下位細分,處理最常見的爭議情境:越位球員擋在門將面前但沒有觸球,是否仍算越位犯規。

手球

1

手球(Law 12)

🟢IFAB 一手核實

不是「球碰到手就是手球」:只有故意用手/臂碰球,或手/臂位置讓身體「不自然變大」而碰到球,才算犯規;手臂貼身、球從自己身上或很近距離彈到手,通常不算。

怎麼判

滿足其一即手球:①故意觸球(手主動向球移動);②手/臂令身體不自然變大(位置非該情境身體動作的自然結果、無法合理化),即使非故意;③無論故不故意,球直接從手/臂入網、或觸手/臂後隨即入網,進球不算。手臂上界 = 腋下(armpit)下緣,不是肩線。

常見誤解

「球碰到手就是手球」→ 錯。判準是故意性或身體是否不自然變大,而非單純接觸;手貼身、近距離彈到通常不成立,需個案判。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 12:handball

    Not every touch of a player's hand/arm with the ball is an offence.

  • IFAB Law 12:故意

    deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball

  • IFAB Law 12:不自然變大

    touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player's body movement for that specific situation.

  • IFAB Law 12:手臂界線

    For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit.

判罰與罰則

5

十二碼:哪些禁區內犯規判罰球

🟢IFAB 一手核實

防守方在自己禁區內犯規,只有當這個犯規本身屬「直接自由球」類(踢、絆、推、拉、撞、手球),才會升級成十二碼;若本身只是「間接自由球」類(危險動作、無接觸阻擋、守門員違例),在禁區內一樣只判間接自由球,不會變十二碼。

怎麼判

先判「犯規屬 Law 12 哪一類」,再看「地點」:direct-FK 類(接觸/手球)且在防守方禁區內 → 升級十二碼;indirect-FK 類即使在禁區內仍只判間接自由球。地點看犯規發生點,不是球的位置。兩門檻缺一不可。

常見誤解

「禁區內任何犯規都判十二碼」→ 錯。十二碼只針對「direct free kick offence」在禁區內;indirect 類即使在禁區內仍只判間接自由球。第一道門檻是「犯規類型」,「禁區內」只是第二道地點門檻。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 14:十二碼觸發

    A penalty kick is awarded if a player commits a direct free kick offence inside their penalty area or off the field as part of play as outlined in Laws 12 and 13.

  • IFAB Law 12:direct free kick 定義

    A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:

  • IFAB Law 12:careless / reckless / excessive force

    Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed. Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned. Excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and/or endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off.

判例:C羅 63' 點球扳平(Renato Veiga 被侵)。

十二碼罰球流程:門將出線與罰球員假動作

🟢IFAB 一手核實

十二碼開球時,守門員必須至少有一隻腳的一部分接觸、對齊或在門線後方,不能提前衝出去;如果守門員犯規而且清楚影響了結果,要重踢,如果沒有影響則不用重踢。另一方面,罰球員在完成助跑後才做假動作(例如助跑到最後一刻突然停頓騙門將)是違例,會被黃牌警告;助跑途中的假動作則是合法的。

怎麼判

守門員犯規分三種情況:①球還是進了,入球有效;②球偏出球門或打中門柱、橫樑但沒進,只有守門員的犯規清楚影響了罰球員時才重踢,否則不重踢;③守門員的動作直接令球沒有進門(例如撲救了原本會進的球),一定要重踢。罰球員假動作只看助跑「完成」的時間點:完成助跑後才假動作即違例,黃牌並判罰間接自由球給防守方;助跑過程中的假動作(節奏變化、放慢腳步等)合法。

常見誤解

「守門員只要提早移動就一定要重踢」→ 錯,要清楚影響了罰球員或球的結果才重踢,沒有影響的提早移動不會導致重踢。「罰球員做假動作一律犯規」→ 錯,只有完成助跑後的假動作才違例,助跑途中放慢、變速等都合法。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 14:守門員位置要求

    When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, in line with, or behind, the goal line.

  • IFAB Law 14:守門員犯規的三種結果

    if the goalkeeper offends: if the ball enters the goal from the kick, a goal is awarded; if the ball misses the goal or rebounds from the crossbar or goalpost(s), the kick is only retaken if the goalkeeper's offence clearly impacted on the kicker; if the ball is prevented from entering the goal by the goalkeeper, the kick is retaken

  • IFAB Law 14:罰球員假動作

    feinting to kick the ball once the kicker has completed the run-up (feinting in the run-up is permitted); the referee cautions the kicker

DOGSO:阻止明顯得分機會

🟢IFAB 一手核實

單刀被鏟、被拉倒,不是「最後一人犯規就一定紅牌」。裁判要看犯規地點、進攻方向、控球可能、防守人數這四點;禁區內只要是「真心去踢球/搶球」被判犯規(通常給點球),降判黃牌;禁區外或不是搶球(拉扯、推人、手球)才紅牌。

怎麼判

兩層:①是否構成 DOGSO,綜合四考量(距離/方向/控球可能/攻守人數與位置),非機械「最後一人」;②紅或黃:禁區內導致點球且「試圖踢球或搶球」→ 黃牌(避免點球+紅牌雙重處罰);「其他情況」(拉扯/推撞/無踢球可能)→ 紅牌。禁區外原則直接紅牌。

常見誤解

「最後一名防守球員/造成單刀的犯規一律紅牌」→ 錯。紅黃取決於「地點(禁區內/外)」+「性質(是否試圖踢/搶球)」,而非「是不是最後一人」。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 12:DOGSO 四考量

    The following must be considered: distance between the offence and the goal; general direction of the play; likelihood of keeping or gaining control of the ball; location and number of defenders and attackers

  • IFAB Law 12:禁區內降黃例外

    Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offender is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball or a challenge for the ball. In all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.), the offending player must be sent off.

烏龍球(Own Goal):一般比賽與定位球「直接入己網」的四種例外

🟢IFAB 一手核實

一般比賽入球不理會是哪一方送入,只要整個球越過本方球門線,對方就計入球,包括防守方自己把球弄入自己球門(即「烏龍球」)。規則本身沒有一條稱為「own goal」的正式條文,這個結果是「入球判定通則」(Law 10)的自然結果。但有四種定位球(任意球/界外球/球門球/角球)若「直接」踢/擲入自己球門,屬於書面明文的例外:不計入球,改判角球給對方。

怎麼判

①一般比賽任何時候:解圍出錯、身體反彈、守門員脫手令球進入自己球門,對方就計入球,這不是特例,是 Law 10 通則的自然結果。②四種指定定位球若「直接」送入自己球門:不計入球,改判角球給對方;「直接」是指離開定位球位置後,未經任何其他球員觸碰就入網,若中途被人觸碰過才入網,就不符合「直接」的定義,回到一般烏龍球的處理,正常計入球。③這四種例外不對稱:送入自己球門即不計球、判角球;但同一種定位球若送入對方球門,直接任意球/球門球/角球都計入球;只有界外球例外,送入哪一方球門都不計入球。

常見誤解

誤解一:「規則裡有『烏龍球』這一條」,這是錯的,IFAB 原文和詞彙表裡都沒有「own goal」的正式定義,一般比賽的烏龍球只是通則的結果,不是獨立條文。誤解二:「定位球都一樣,只要不小心弄入自己球門就叫烏龍球」,這也是錯的,四種定位球若「直接」送入自己球門,不算入球(改判角球)。誤解三:「界外球和角球一樣,直接送入對方球門也算入球」,這同樣是錯的,界外球在任何情況下都不能直接攻門得分。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 10:入球判定通則

    A goal is scored when the whole of the ball passes over the goal line, between the goalposts and under the crossbar, provided that no offence has been committed by the team scoring the goal.

  • IFAB Law 13:任意球直接入己網/對方網

    if a direct free kick is kicked directly into the opponents' goal, a goal is awarded · if a direct or indirect free kick is kicked directly into the team's own goal, a corner kick is awarded · if an indirect free kick is kicked directly into the opponents' goal, a goal kick is awarded

  • IFAB Law 15:界外球直接入己網/對方網

    if the ball enters the opponents' goal – a goal kick is awarded · if the ball enters the thrower's goal – a corner kick is awarded

  • IFAB Law 16:球門球直接入己網

    A goal may be scored directly from a goal kick, but only against the opposing team; if the ball directly enters the kicker's goal, a corner kick is awarded to the opponents.

  • IFAB Law 17:角球直接入己網

    A goal may be scored directly from a corner kick, but only against the opposing team; if the ball directly enters the kicker's goal, a corner kick is awarded to the opponents.

判例:阿根廷加時第 111 分鐘由 Diney Borges 送出烏龍球,終場 3 比 2 淘汰佛得角。當時 Messi 主罰角球,Cristian Romero 頭球爭頂,球再觸及 Borges 後偏入自己球門。這屬於一般烏龍球(Law 10 通則),不是 Law 17 的角球例外,因為球先經 Romero 頭球觸碰才偏轉入網,不是「直接」由角球未經觸碰入網;而且 Law 17 的例外只適用於主罰角球一方把球送入自己球門,方向剛好相反。事件經 ESPN 與 Sky Sports 交叉核實,描述一致。

角球 vs 球門球:只看最後觸球方

🟢IFAB 一手核實

球整個出底線(非入球)之後,判角球還是球門球,唯一判準是最後是哪一方球員碰到球:進攻方最後觸球,判球門球給防守方;防守方(含門將)最後觸球,判角球給進攻方。跟球是怎麼出界的(射門、解圍、折射)沒有關係,只看最後觸球方。

怎麼判

唯一判準是最後觸球方,跟出界前球經過幾次觸碰、是不是射門、是不是解圍都無關:最後觸球者屬進攻方 → 球門球(防守方開);最後觸球者屬防守方(含門將)→ 角球(進攻方開)。

常見誤解

「角球只有射門被守門員撲出底線才算」→ 錯,不管是守門員撲救、後衛解圍不慎,或任何防守方球員最後觸球後出界,只要最後觸球的是防守方,一律判角球,不是只有撲救才算。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 16:球門球判定

    A goal kick is awarded when the whole of the ball passes over the goal line, on the ground or in the air, having last touched a player of the attacking team, and a goal is not scored

  • IFAB Law 17:角球判定

    A corner kick is awarded when: the whole of the ball passes over the goal line, on the ground or in the air, having last touched a player of the defending team, and a goal is not scored

裁判裁量

4

VAR 介入門檻與可覆核範圍

🟢IFAB 一手核實

VAR 不是「什麼都能翻」的第二裁判:只有原判是「清晰明顯的錯誤」或「嚴重漏判」,且屬於進球、十二碼、直接紅牌、認錯球員這四類,VAR 才介入;場上主裁才是最終決定者。

怎麼判

兩層門檻缺一不可:①事件類型(只限進球/十二碼/直接紅牌非二黃/認錯人四類);②錯誤程度(clear and obvious error 或 serious missed incident)。介入後 factual 判斷由 VAR 直接告知(VAR-only review);subjective 判斷主裁須親自看場邊回放(OFR)。VAR 只能建議,改不改判在主裁。

常見誤解

「VAR 可覆核任何有爭議判罰,覺得判錯就該翻」→ 錯。VAR 被限縮在四類 + clear-and-obvious 雙門檻;大量主觀邊緣判斷仍屬主裁裁量,VAR 不會、也不被允許僅因「意見不同」介入。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB VAR Protocol:Principles

    A video assistant referee (VAR) is a match official, with independent access to match footage, who may assist the referee only in the event of a 'clear and obvious error' or 'serious missed incident'

  • IFAB VAR Protocol:可覆核四類

    a. Goal/no goal | b. Penalty kick/no penalty kick | c. Direct red Red cards (not second yellow card/caution) | d. Mistaken identity (red or yellow card)

  • IFAB VAR Protocol:subjective 判斷

    For subjective decisions, e.g. intensity of a foul challenge, interference at offside, handball considerations, an 'on-field review' (OFR) is appropriate

  • IFAB VAR Protocol:最終決定權

    The final decision is always taken by the referee

爭議接口(→爭議庭):subjective 判定(有意識 vs 被動)VAR 只能靠 OFR,無感應器可量,連證偽都難,這是「舉證標準之爭」的制度背景。判例:葡 2-1 克 越位覆核。

有利(Advantage,Law 5)

🟢IFAB 一手核實

犯規發生後,若被侵犯那隊不吹哨、讓比賽繼續反而更有利,裁判可以「打有利」不停錶;但如果那個有利在幾秒內沒真的發展出來,裁判仍會把哨子吹回來、改判原本那個犯規。

怎麼判

①時間窗:有利是否在「當下」或「數秒內」兌現成實質利益(控球/推進/射門);沒兌現 → 召回吹罰原犯規或重踢。②裁量:犯規嚴重程度(夠紅牌通常須停下罰下)、位置、是否有立即有希望的進攻、比賽氣氛。打有利處理「比賽是否停」,不是「犯規者要不要記過」。

常見誤解

「打了有利,那個犯規就不會再被罰、犯規者不會再被出牌」→ 錯。有利在數秒內沒發展會召回改判;即使有利兌現,原犯規若本應有紀律處分,裁判仍可在下一次死球時對犯規者出牌。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 5.3:advantage

    allows play to continue when an offence occurs, or a restart is incorrectly taken and the ball is in play, and the non-offending opposing team will benefit from the advantage, and penalises the offence/orders a retake if the anticipated advantage does not ensue at that time or within a few seconds

「下一死球出牌」屬 Law 12 銜接規定,白話帶過。

補時/傷停補時(Law 7)

🟢IFAB 一手核實

補時顯示的數字是裁判決定的「最少」要加的時間,不是上限:裁判是全場唯一計時者,覺得損失時間比顯示的多,隨時可以再往上加,但不能倒扣。

怎麼判

第四官員舉牌的數字法理上是「最少」補時,來源 = 裁判認定的損失時間總和(換人、傷病、拖延、紀律處分、醫療暫停、VAR 檢查與覆核、進球慶祝、及其他任何原因)。舉牌後再有新損失,裁判可再加;只有裁判有權決定何時吹終場。唯一鎖死:上半場算錯不能靠調整下半場補償。

常見誤解

「顯示的補時是固定值/是這半場最多補這麼多」→ 錯。顯示的是「最少」,球例明文「可以增加,但不能減少」;「顯示 6 分鐘結果踢到第 8 分鐘」是條文賦予的裁量空間。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 7:allowance for time lost

    Allowance is made by the referee in each half for all playing time lost in that half through: substitutions; assessment and/or removal of injured players; wasting time; disciplinary sanctions; medical stoppages permitted by competition rules e.g. 'drinks' breaks (which should not exceed one minute) and 'cooling' breaks (ninety seconds to three minutes); delays relating to VAR 'checks' and 'reviews'; goal celebrations; any other cause, including any significant delay to a restart (e.g. due to interference by an outside agent)

  • IFAB Law 7:最少補時

    The fourth official indicates the minimum additional time decided by the referee at the end of the final minute of each half.

  • IFAB Law 7:只加不減

    The additional time may be increased by the referee but not reduced.

判例:本屆新規「拖時間全面收緊」,補時是拖時間打擊的機制背景。

換人 10 秒離場:本屆新規

🟢IFAB 一手核實

換人時,被換下的球員必須在換人牌舉起(或裁判示意換人)後 10 秒內離開球場;裁判可以用舉手方式倒數最後 5 秒。如果 10 秒內沒有離場,球員仍然要儘快離開,但替補球員不能馬上入場,比賽會先恢復進行,替補球員要等到之後第一次死球、而且比賽恢復滿 1 分鐘後才能入場。安全、保安或傷勢等原因導致真的無法在 10 秒內離場的,裁判可以不套用這條規則。

怎麼判

離場時限從換人牌舉起(或裁判示意)那一刻起算,10 秒內球員必須完全離開場地邊界線;裁判可視情況以舉手方式倒數最後 5 秒。逾時的後果不是直接判罰,而是拖慢換人生效的時間:球員仍要儘快離場,但替補球員原本可以入場的權利被延後,要等到之後第一次比賽死球、而且距離比賽恢復已經過 1 分鐘,裁判示意後才能入場,換人本身不會被取消或換人選。裁判有裁量權:球員傷勢明顯無法在時限內離場、或無法從邊界線最近點離場(安全/保安理由)等情況可以不套用。

常見誤解

「換人拖延超過 10 秒會被黃牌」→ 錯,這條規則的後果是延後替補入場時間,不是直接紀律處分。「超時之後換人就取消了」→ 錯,換人本身不會被取消,也不能換成其他球員,只是替補入場的時間點被延後。

規則原文(IFAB,英文)
  • IFAB Law 3:換人離場時限

    must be off the field of play within ten seconds of the substitution board being shown or, where there is no board, of the referee's signal for the substitution to take place, except where this is not possible due to safety/security or injury

  • IFAB 換人時限協定:倒數機制

    The referee may visually count down the last five seconds with a raised hand; this visual countdown may be accompanied by a verbal countdown where appropriate.

  • IFAB 換人時限協定:逾時後果

    If the player being substituted has not left the field of play within the ten seconds: they must still leave the field of play as quickly as possible, the substitute is not permitted to enter the field of play, play restarts, the substitution cannot be cancelled nor the substitute changed, the substitute may only enter the field of play at the first stoppage after one minute has elapsed following the restart and after receiving a signal from the referee

本屆新規,配合本屆「拖時間全面收緊」方向。